How AgWise Works for Agriculture
We combine advanced technology with deep agricultural and tax expertise to maximize your R&D credits — from discovery through audit defense.
The U.S. Tax Court just confirmed what we've always known: The innovation happening in your fields, barns, and feed mills qualifies for federal R&D tax credits. If you're experimenting to improve performance, you're leaving money on the table.
We combine advanced technology with deep agricultural and tax expertise to maximize your R&D credits — from discovery through audit defense.
We assess your operations to identify all qualifying research activities — not just the obvious ones.
Our platform integrates with your existing systems to capture contemporaneous evidence automatically.
We quantify qualified research expenses across all eligible categories using the optimal method.
We prepare comprehensive technical documentation and Form 6765 — audit-ready from day one.
Year-round guidance, quarterly reviews, and 100% audit defense if challenges arise.
George of Missouri, Inc. (GOMI) — a major integrated poultry producer processing approximately 3.5 million birds weekly — claimed R&D tax credits for experimental work conducted between 2012 and 2016.
Operating on razor-thin margins of approximately one cent per pound of chicken, GOMI relied on data-driven experimentation with growth rates, mortality rates, and disease prevalence to stay competitive.
The IRS challenged these claims. The Tax Court sided with GOMI — marking the first time animal agriculture was legally recognized for R&D tax credits.
First-ever recognition that livestock operations can claim R&D credits for systematic experimentation.
Broilers in experimental flocks are "pilot models" — their development costs, including feed, qualify as research expenses.
You don't need to claim wage expenses to claim supply expenses — critical for operations with complex payroll structures.
The court "will not wing it with an estimate ungrounded in the record." Documentation is non-negotiable.
Together with the row crop ruling, agriculture R&D credits now have solid legal footing across the industry.
For activities to qualify as eligible research under Section 41, they must satisfy all four requirements. Here's what that looks like on a farm.
The research must aim to create or improve a product's functionality, performance, reliability, or quality — or improve a business process.
The research must rely on principles of physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.
The research must attempt to resolve uncertainty about the capability, methodology, or appropriate design of the product or process.
The research must involve a systematic evaluation of alternatives — modeling, simulation, prototyping, or trial and error — to eliminate uncertainty.
You don't need breakthrough discoveries or a dedicated lab. You need technical uncertainty, a process of evaluation, and an effort to improve performance.
Testing new disease prevention protocols, priming methods, or dosage strategies to improve herd or flock health outcomes.
Evaluating probiotic supplements aimed at improving animal health, gut performance, and production metrics.
Trialing genetic lines to enhance growth rates, disease resistance, yield characteristics, or product quality.
Developing or testing new feed formulations, feeding techniques, and nutritional strategies to optimize performance.
Implementing new equipment or automation techniques to make breeding, raising, harvesting, or processing more effective.
Developing new methodologies for disease management, biosecurity protocols, and prevention strategies.
Systematic testing of seed varieties, soil treatments, irrigation methods, or agronomic practices to increase yield.
Developing or adapting automated systems for planting, monitoring, harvesting, or post-harvest processing.
Experimentation aimed at improving product characteristics, shelf life, consistency, or compliance with quality standards.
The George case wasn't just a win — it was a warning. The same company had credits allowed AND denied based entirely on documentation quality.
“The court will not wing it with an estimate ungrounded in the record.”
— U.S. Tax Court, George v. Commissioner (2026)
You're already creating most of these records — production logs, feed recipes, trial results. The George court confirmed that documents created in the normal course of business are your strongest evidence. You don't need special “research” files.
Most farms are doing qualifying work without realizing it. Let's take a look.